UK troops in Afghanistan ‘to move out of Sangin’


BBC News | Wednesday, 7 July 2010 | 08:32 GMT

British troops in Afghanistan are to hand over responsibility for the Sangin area of Helmand province to US forces, the BBC understands. The UK has suffered its heaviest losses in the area with 99 deaths since 2001. British Defence Secretary Liam Fox is expected to tell MPs the move could happen by the end of the year. The military insists the move is redeployment now there are more US troops on the ground, but the Taliban are certain to portray it as a defeat.

Difficult questions

Last month Britain handed over command in Helmand to a US general. Maj Gen Richard Mills, of the US Marine Corps, assumed control of all Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) troops in Helmand on 1 June. Dr Fox is expected to announce Britain will concentrate on Helmand’s busy central belt, leaving the north and south to the US. The BBC also understands that more British troops will be sent to Helmand to help with the redeployment. The logistic and security troops will come from the Theatre Reserve Battalion stationed at Episkopi in Cyprus, according to military sources. The Theatre Reserve Battalion for Afghanistan is currently provided by the 2nd Battalion, The Duke of Lancaster’s Regiment. The BBC’s Quentin Sommerville in Kabul said the deployment of the additional British troops to the area is intended to be purely temporary, while existing UK troops are moved from Sangin. BBC defence correspondent Jonathan Beale said Dr Fox is likely to face some difficult questions, not least from the families of the British servicemen killed in Sangin.

‘Bail out’

He said: "They may well ask… ‘Why have we sacrificed so much just to hand over responsibility to the Americans?’" The Ministry of Defence will also be concerned it will be seen as a pull out or withdrawal by the British, with US forces bailing out UK troops, our correspondent added. He said Dr Fox, backed by commanders on the ground, is likely to argue the transfer makes military and strategic sense as Sangin is now under US command and there are more US troops on the ground. He is also expected to tell MPs Britain is not lowering its profile or commitment to Afghanistan. But Conservative MP and former British army officer, Patrick Mercer, said the handover was a routine move and should under no circumstances be considered a retreat.  

He told the BBC: "It’s absolutely straightforward and normal in coalition warfare like this for units to serve under foreign command, but it’s not necessarily desirable. There are now enough troops for this no longer to be necessary and any suggestion that British forces are being beaten out of Sangin or returning with their tails between their legs is not just disingenuous, it’s actually disgusting." Gen Sir Richard Dannatt, the former head of the British army, said it was likely that the number of deaths would increase to 400 but the coalition had to continue its commitment to Afghanistan. He told BBC Radio 4’s Today the troops in southern Afghanistan had attracted attention from the Taliban and had become like "flies in a honey pot". "The intention when we went into southern Afghanistan was to try to get the country on its feet economically – try to get some reconstruction and development going. We all know it didn’t turn out that way. The Taliban decided, perfectly reasonably, because it was their intention to do that, to contest the turf on which we were trying to get development going."

He said the troops had been spread thinly and added that "inevitably made the small number of British soldiers like flies in a honey pot and we got into this cycle of fighting". He added it was important for the British public to understand why soldiers were still in Afghanistan to protect the UK’s national security interests, and that the cost, "while very tough for the families who lose loved ones", was worth the price being paid. Of the 312 UK deaths in Afghanistan since 2001, a third has taken place in Sangin, currently home to 40 Commando Royal Marines. Col Stuart Tootal, who commanded the first UK battle group of 1,200 soldiers sent into Sangin four years ago said the number of deaths that had taken place in Sangin meant there was a lot of "emotion" attached to the area. He said: "It makes no sense for a logistic and command point of view to keep a British battle group away from its main brigade when it’s now an American area and there are American troops to take over from them. This reflects good practical military sense and we shouldn’t allow emotion or misinterpretation to be put above that."

Rival tribes

Sangin is the latest part of the province to be handed over to US control after the town of Musa Qaleh in March and the Kajaki dam last month. It has witnessed some of the fiercest fighting the British military has endured since World War II, and contains a mix of rival tribes. It is also a volatile northern district at the heart of the opium-growing industry. The UK’s 8,000 forces in Helmand are greatly outnumbered by the 20,000 US Marines sent there by President Barack Obama.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s